Lambert Vet Supply, LLC v. Martin et al
Filing
55
ORDER - The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 53 ) are adopted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter default of all defendants. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LAMBERT VET SUPPLY, LLC,
Plaintiff,
4:14CV03129
vs.
ORDER
CHRIS MARTIN, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation (Filing No. 53) recommending that the Court enter the
default of all defendants.
No defendant has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provides for de novo review of a Magistrate Judge’s
findings or recommendations only when a party objects to them. Cf. Peretz v.
United States, 501 U.S. 923, 933-34 (1991). Failure to object to a finding of
fact in a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation may be construed as a waiver of
the
right
to
object
from
the
district
court’s
order
adopting
the
recommendation of the finding of fact. NECivR 72.2(f). And the failure to file
an objection eliminates not only the need for de novo review, but any review
by the Court. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); cf. United States v.
Meyer, 439 F.3d 855, 858-59 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court will adopt
the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation (Filing
No. 53) are adopted; and
2. the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter default of all
defendants.
Dated this 19th day of July, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?