Chapman v. Sosa-Gayton et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Chapman's Objection (Filing No. 14 ) is overruled. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) YVONNE D. SOSA-GAYTON, TIM ) BURNS, DOUGLAS COUNTY PUBLIC ) DEFENDERS OFFICE, and JUDGE ) CONIGLIA, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 4:14CV3141 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Billie Joe Chapman’s Objection (Filing No. 14) to correspondence received from the associate warden of Chapman’s previous place of incarceration, the Newton Correctional Facility. This correspondence (Filing No. 11) set forth that Chapman had altered his inmate trust account statement prior to submitting it to this Court for review. correspondence. The Court took no action in response to the In addition, Chapman is no longer incarcerated at the Newton Correctional Facility. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Chapman’s Objection (Filing No. 14) is overruled. DATED this 24th day of February, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court * This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?