Chapman v. Sosa-Gayton et al

Filing 27

ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the memorandum opinion entered herein this date, filing 26 , IT IS ORDERED: Chapman's claims against defendant Judge Coniglia are dismissed with prejudice. Chapman's claims against Yvonne Sosa-Gayton and Tim Burns are dismissed without prejudice to reassertion in a habeas corpus action or similar proceeding. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) YVONNE D. SOSA-GAYTON, TIM ) BURNS, DOUGLAS COUNTY PUBLIC ) DEFENDERS OFFICE, and JUDGE ) CONIGLIA, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 4:14CV3141 ORDER AND JUDGMENT Pursuant to the memorandum opinion entered herein this date, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Chapman’s claims against defendant Judge Coniglia are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Chapman’s claims against Yvonne Sosa-Gayton and Tim Burns are dismissed without prejudice to reassertion in a habeas corpus action or similar proceeding. 3. Plaintiff is hereby notified that the filing of a notice of appeal will make him liable for payment of the full $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. This is because the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires an incarcerated civil appellant to pay the full amount of the $505.00 appellate filing fee by making monthly payments to the court, even if he or she is proceeding in forma pauperis. U.S.C. § 1915(b). 28 By filing a notice of appeal, plaintiff will be consenting to the deduction of the $505.00 filing fee from his prison account by prison officials. DATED this 1st day of July, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?