Hooker v. Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. et al
AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER - The parties' motion to amend, (Filing No. 31 ), is granted in part and denied in part as stated herein. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MEGHAN M. HOOKER,
HIBBETT SPORTING GOODS, INC., a
foreign corporation; TIFFANY HURT,
TINA GARDNER, BLAKE FRICKE,
IT IS ORDERED:
The parties’ motion to amend, (Filing No. 31), is granted in part and denied in
part as follows:
The trial, pretrial conference, and telephonic conference settings are
The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33 through 36
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is September 15, 2015. Motions to
compel Rule 33 through 36 discovery must be filed by September 30,
The defendant’s deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to
testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)),
and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is July 15, 2015.
The deadlines for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected
to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)),
and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s):
For the defendant(s):
May 27, 2015.
August 15, 2015.
September 4, 2015.
The deposition deadline is September 15, 2015.
The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary
judgment is October 1, 2015. The parties are advised, however, that the
trial and pretrial conference are not continued, and any summary judgment
or Daubert motion filed on or after July 27, 2015, may not be ruled on
prior to the pretrial conference or trial.
The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and
related grounds is October 1, 2015.
May 5, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?