Nelson v. D.E.A. et al

Filing 8

ORDER - 1) The plaintiff has timely and sufficiently responded to the court's order to show cause. This case is not subject to dismissal at this time under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution.2) The plaintiff& #039;s motion to amend, (Filing No. 7 ), is granted. Liberally construing the plaintiff's filings, the plaintiff's operative complaint alleges the claims described in his original complaint, (Filing No. 1 ), against the defendants named i n his motion to amend, (Filing No. 7 ).3) The clerk shall modify the docket sheet accordingly and shall issue and provide to the plaintiff summons for service on each of the defendants listed in Filing No. 7 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL TROY NELSON,
Plaintiff,

4:14CV3149

vs.
ORDER
D.E.A., Asset Forfeiture Section; and
FORFEITURE COUNSEL, Asset
Forfeiture Section;
Defendants.
IT IS ORDERED:

1)

The plaintiff has timely and sufficiently responded to the court’s order to

show cause. This case is not subject to dismissal at this time under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution.

2)

The plaintiff’s motion to amend, (Filing No. 7), is granted.

Liberally

construing the plaintiff’s filings, the plaintiff’s operative complaint alleges the claims
described in his original complaint, (Filing No. 1), against the defendants named in his
motion to amend, (Filing No. 7).

3)

The clerk shall modify the docket sheet accordingly and shall issue and

provide to the plaintiff summons for service on each of the defendants listed in Filing No.
7.

Dated this 9th day of February, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge