Harrington v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission et al

Filing 54

ORDER - On or before July 17, 2015, plaintiff has leave to file his Third Amended Complaint. The defendants' motion (Filing No. 39 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHANE HARRINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TOM CASADY, JIM PESCHONG, ) JOHN SPATZ, RUSSELL FOSLER ) and HOBERT RUPE, individually ) and in their official ) capacities as employees of ) the City of Lincoln and the ) State of Nebraska, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 4:14CV3171 ORDER This matter is before the Court on various issues. If the parties wish to bring any matter before this Court, they must comply with the local rules. The parties are referred to Local Rule 7.1. The defendants have filed another motion to dismiss (Filing No. 39). Plaintiff Shane Harrington has requested leave to amend his complaint (Filing No. 44) in a brief. The Court will not address the deficiencies of the Second Amended Complaint. On the plaintiff’s stipulation that no further amendments will be made (Filing No. 44, at 4, ¶ 13), the Court will allow the plaintiff to file his Third Amended Complaint. IT IS ORDERED: 1) On or before July 17, 2015, plaintiff has leave to file his Third Amended Complaint. 2) The defendants’ motion (Filing No. 39) is denied as moot). DATED this 30th day of June, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?