Harrington v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission et al

Filing 86

ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d). This matter is before the Court upon the agreement of the parties for an order pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (Filing No. 84 ). It appe ars to the Court that entry of this Rule 502(d) Order will limit further expenditure of time and resources by the Court and the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored informat ion ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SHANE HARRINGTON and KALI RECORDS,
LLC,

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF LINCOLN, NEBRASKA, a municipal )
corporation, TOM CASADY, JIM PESCHONG, )
and RUSSELL FOSLER, individually, and in their )
official capacities as employees of the City of
)
Lincoln,
)
)
Defendants.
)

4:14CV3171

ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE
OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d)

This matter is before the Court upon the agreement of the parties for an order
pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (Filing No. 84). It appears to the
Court that entry of this Rule 502(d) Order will limit further expenditure of time and resources by
the Court and the parties,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents,

electronically stored information ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not
a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state
proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by
Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).

2)

Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's

right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance,
responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.
DATED this 8th day of December, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court