Frank v. Madison County Sherriffs Department et al

Filing 46

ORDER that the plaintiff's Motion to Incur Expenses from Federal Practice Fund 38 and amended motion 44 are granted. Plaintiff's counsel is authorized to incur expenses as proposed, not to exceed $5,750 absent further permission from the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JESSE ALAN FRANK, Plaintiff, 4:14CV3184 vs. ORDER TERRY KOTROUS, Captain, and BILL KUCERA, Sergeant, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion to Incur Expenses from Federal Practice Fund (Filing No. 38).1 The court previously requested additional information from the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel regarding the proposed expenses. See Filing No. 39 - Order. The plaintiff has provided such information. See Filing Nos. 44 and 45 - SEALED. Upon review of the proposed expenses, the reason for the expenses, and the plaintiff’s financial affidavit, in accordance with Section 1(b) of Attachment A to the Amended Plan for the Administration of the Federal Practice Fund and the Federal Practice Committee (the Plan)2, the court approves plaintiff’s counsel proposed expenses. Plaintiff’s counsel shall adhere to Section 4 of the Plan when seeking reimbursement. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s Motion to Incur Expenses from Federal Practice Fund (Filing No. 38) and amended motion (Filing No. 44) are granted. 2. Plaintiff’s counsel is authorized to incur expenses as proposed, not to exceed $5,750 absent further permission from the court. Dated this 19th day of August, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge 1 The document is titled Projected Expense Sheet, although on CM/ECF the document is titled Motion to Incur Expenses from Federal Practice Fund. 2 http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/attorney/federal-practice-committee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?