Akins v. Martinez et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case managementdeadline in this case using the following text: January 2, 2015: check for address. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SAMAR AKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DORY MORE MARTINEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:14CV3204

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On November 10, 2014, the
Clerk of the Court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last known address in Case Number
4:14CV3218, and it was returned to this court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has an
obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR
1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of
address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if
Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order
to apprise the court of his current address in the absence of which this matter will be
dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff.
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: January 2, 2015: check for address.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

2