Shotwell v. Regional West Medical Center

Filing 63

ORDER defendant's motion (filing 57 ) is granted. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for case progression. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUDY SHOTWELL, Plaintiff, 4:14-CV-3210 vs. ORDER REGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to amend the progression order, in which it seeks leave to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment (filing 57). That motion will be granted. On August 30, 2016, this Court entered a Memorandum and Order granting the defendant's summary judgment motion in part, and denying it in part. Filing 51. The Court, pursuant to that Memorandum and Order, dismissed the plaintiff's claims for failure to accommodate and disability discrimination. However, the Court permitted the plaintiff to proceed on her claim for retaliation. Filing 51 at 10. The defendant seeks leave to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment to address the plaintiff's remaining claim. The plaintiff objects to the defendant's request, characterizing it as a motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and suggesting that additional briefing will result in undue delay. Filing 60 at 2. The defendant has not filed a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). Instead, it seeks to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment because, as it claims, it "did not expressly address Plaintiff's retaliation claim in its [initial] Motion for Summary Judgment or its Brief in Support of that Motion." Filing 62 at 1. Thus, the standards which govern Rule 60(b) are not, as the plaintiff contends, applicable. The Court finds that the defendant's motion is warranted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The defendant's motion (filing 57) is granted. 2. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for case progression. Dated this 8th day of November, 2016. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?