United States of America v. Fox

Filing 9

ORDER - Mr. Fox's motion (Filing No. 8 ) is granted. The hearing in this matter is rescheduled to be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on Friday, March 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 7, Second Floor, Roman L. Hruska Uni ted States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Counsel for the plaintiff and Mr. Fox are required to attend the hearing. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Fox at: George E. Fox, 203 N. Elm Street, Tilden, Nebraska 68781, Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, 4:14CV3211 vs. ORDER GEORGE E. FOX, Respondent. This matter is before the court on George E. Fox’s (Mr. Fox) motion to continue the hearing in this matter for sixty days. See Filing No. 8 - Motion. Mr. Fox represents he needs time to obtain counsel, arrange his finances, and locate housing for his daughter and her family. Id. Natalie M. Loebner, counsel for the government, called the undersigned magistrate judge’s chambers on January 5, 2015, and stated the government will not oppose the motion. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Mr. Fox’s motion (Filing No. 8) is granted. 2. The hearing in this matter is rescheduled to be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on Friday, March 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 7, Second Floor, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Counsel for the plaintiff and Mr. Fox are required to attend the hearing. 3. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Fox at: George E. Fox 203 N. Elm Street Tilden, Nebraska 68781 Dated this 6th day of January, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?