Jacks v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND REMAND - Counts II and III of Plaintiffs Complaint (Filing No. 1 -1) are dismissed without prejudice; All other pending motions are terminated as moot; and This matter is remanded to the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska, for further proceedings. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NATHANIEL JACKS, Plaintiff, 4:14CV3215 vs. STATE OF NEBRASKA, STEVE WILSON, individually and in his official capacity as Protection and Safety Program Specialist for the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; and KERRY WINTERER, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND REMAND Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice and Motion to Remand (Filing No. 12) submitted by Plaintiff Nathanial Jacks (“Plaintiff”). Plaintiff seeks dismissal of Counts II and III of his Complaint (Filing No. 1-1), and requests that the Court remand the remaining state tort claim, Count I, to the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. Defendants do not object to Plaintiff’s requests. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted; Counts II and III of his Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice; and this matter should be remanded to state court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Counts II and III of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Filing No. 1-1) are dismissed without prejudice; 2. All other pending motions are terminated as moot; and 3. This matter is remanded to the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska, for further proceedings. Dated this 26th day of January, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?