Beerbohm v. Saunders County, Nebraska et al
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 30 days to apprise the court of his current address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 12, 2015, check for address; dismiss if no update. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DREW T.M. BEERBOHM,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAUNDERS COUNTY,
NEBRASKA, and UNKNOWN
GUARD,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:15CV3002
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. The court takes judicial notice
of Nebraska Department of Correctional Services public records, which show that
Plaintiff has been released from incarceration. See Stutzka v. McCarville, 420 F.3d 757,
761, n.2 (8th Cir. 2005) (court may take judicial notice of public records). Plaintiff has
an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR
1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of
address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if
Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have 30 days to apprise the
court of his current address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this matter
without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a
pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 12, 2015,
check for address; dismiss if no update.
DATED this 14th day of July, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?