Flores v. United States Attorney General, et al

Filing 5

ORDER provisionally granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint will be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ERIC FLORES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ) GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU ) OF INVESTIGATION, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 4:15CV3038 ORDER Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2). Having reviewed plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds that plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. DATED this 9th day of April, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court * This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?