Flores v. United States Attorney General, et al
Filing
5
ORDER provisionally granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint will be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ERIC FLORES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
)
GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU
)
OF INVESTIGATION,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
4:15CV3038
ORDER
Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2).
Having reviewed
plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds that plaintiff is financially
eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is provisionally granted, and the complaint shall be filed
without payment of fees.
Plaintiff is advised that the next step
in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of
his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
The Court will conduct this
initial review in its normal course of business.
DATED this 9th day of April, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
* This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no
agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of
the Court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?