Harrington v. Hall County Board of Supervisors et al

Filing 121

ORDER regarding conference call held 8/27/2015.1) Defendants' briefs on their motions to dismiss will be considered as also filed in opposition to Plaintiff's motions to amend. Any additional response the defendants may want to file in response to Plaintiff's motions to amend, (Filing Nos. 78 & 114 ), shall be filed on or before September 1, 2015.2) On or before September 4, 2015, Plaintiff may file a reply in support of his motions to amend.3) As of midnight on September 4, 2015, this case is stayed pending the court's ruling on Defendants' motions to dismiss and Plaintiff's motions to amend. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SHANE HARRINGTON,
Plaintiff,

4:15CV3052

vs.
ORDER
HALL COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS, et. al;
Defendants.
Defendants have moved to dismiss, (see filing nos. 46, 57, 69, 71, and 73), and
after the briefing on those motions was nearly complete, the plaintiff file motions to file
an amended complaint. (Filing Nos. 78 & 114). The defendants oppose Plaintiff’s
motions to amend for reasons already set forth in their arguments on the motions to
dismiss.
To promote the purpose of the federal rules (see Fed.R.Civ.P 1), as more fully
explained on the record during the conference call held on August 27, 2015, (Filing No.
119), Defendants may but they need not file a response to the motions to amend.
Plaintiff’s motions to amend and supporting evidence and brief, (Filing Nos. 78 & 114),
will be considered along with and as part of his response to Defendants’ motions to
dismiss.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Defendants’ briefs on their motions to dismiss will be considered as also
filed in opposition to Plaintiff’s motions to amend. Any additional response the
defendants may want to file in response to Plaintiff’s motions to amend, (Filing Nos. 78
& 114), shall be filed on or before September 1, 2015.
2)
On or before September 4, 2015, Plaintiff may file a reply in support of his
motions to amend.
3)
As of midnight on September 4, 2015, this case is stayed pending the
court’s ruling on Defendants’ motions to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motions to amend.
August 30, 2015.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge