Armstrong v. Hy-Vee, Inc. et al
Filing
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JACQUE ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff,
vs.
HY-VEE, INC.
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 4:15-cv003085-JMG-CRZ
PROTECTIVE ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order. The
Court finds that the parties are engaged in discovery which may involve, among other things, the
production or disclosure of information deemed confidential. Accordingly, the Court finds that
this Protective Order should be and hereby is granted as follows.
FACTS
In this matter Plaintiff claims a violation of her rights guaranteed by the Nebraska Age
Discrimination in Employment Act and the Age Discrimination and Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 621 et seq. Defendant denies the Plaintiff’s claims.
Both Plaintiff and Defendant have requested that the other Party produce in discovery
documents which are private and confidential, including but not limited to personal information
of current and former employees of and parties who have applied for employment with the
Defendant. The parties agree confidential information and documents should be protected as
further set forth herein.
PROTECTIVE ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the documents received and produced by the parties
may be utilized in the preparation of the case, but the parties must do so in accordance with the
following terms:
1.
Confidential Information. “Confidential” information as used herein means
private and confidential information pertaining to the parties, and other unpublished and
confidential information relating to the parties. Such information may include any type or
classification of information which is designated as “Confidential” by the supplying party,
whether revealed during a deposition, in a document, in an interrogatory answer or otherwise.
“Document” as used herein refers to any written, graphic or electronic information, no matter
how produced, recorded, stored or reproduced and includes recordings or other electronically
stored data, together with the programming instructions and other written material necessary to
Page 1 of 4
understand such recordings and data. In designating information as “Confidential” the supplying
party will make such designation only as to that information that that party in good faith believes
to be Confidential. All documents and every portion thereof designated as CONFIDENTIAL
shall constitute CONFIDENTIAL information for the purposes of this Order and shall be used by
the receiving party only for the preparation for and conduct of proceedings herein and not for any
business or other purpose whatsoever.
2.
Qualified Recipients. For the purposes of this Order, and subject to the provisions
of this paragraph, persons authorized to receive “CONFIDENTIAL” information (hereinafter
“qualified recipient”) shall include only:
a) The named parties and members, officers, board members, in-house legal counsel, and
directors of the parties;
b) Legal counsel representing the Defendant and legal counsel representing the Plaintiff, and
members of the paralegal, secretarial, or clerical staff who are employed by, retained by,
or assisting such counsel;
c) The Court, court reporters who take and transcribe testimony, as well as necessary
secretarial and clerical assistants;
d) Consulting or testifying expert witnesses experts who are assisting counsel in the
preparation of this case;
e) Any mediator retained by the parties in an effort to mediate and/or settle the claims of
this action;
f) Any litigation assistant, paralegal, stenographic, secretarial or clerical personnel
employed by, retained by, or assisting a qualified person in this case;
g) The parties’ insurers;
h) Any other persons agreed to by the parties in writing, either as to all or any
CONFIDENTIAL information in this case.
Except as provided herein, CONFIDENTIAL information produced in this case shall be
disclosed by the receiving party only to Qualified Persons who shall have read this Protective
Order. Provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this
Protective Order if the party claiming confidentiality consents in writing to such disclosure.
Requests by a party to disclose Confidential Information beyond the terms of this Protective
Order shall be made in writing.
3.
Maintenance of Confidentiality.
CONFIDENTIAL information shall be
maintained confidentially by each qualified recipient to whom it is disclosed; shall be used only
for purposes of this action and shall not be disclosed to any person who is not a qualified
recipient. Each party, each qualified recipient, and all counsel representing any party, shall use
Page 2 of 4
their best efforts to maintain all produced CONFIDENTIAL information in such a manner as to
prevent access, even at hearing or trial, by individuals who are not qualified recipients.
4.
Copies. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be copied or otherwise
reproduced by the receiving party, except for transmission to qualified recipients, without the
written permission of the producing party, or, in the alternative, by further Order of the Court.
However, noting herein shall restrict a qualified recipient from making working copies, abstracts,
digests, and analyses of CONFIDENTIAL information which shall be maintained confidentially
under the terms of this Order.
5.
Filing Confidential Information. All documents of any nature (including any of
the foregoing documents as well as any other documents, including, but not limited to, briefs,
motions, memoranda, transcripts, and the like) that are filed with the Court for any purpose and
that contain CONFIDENTIAL information shall be filed in accordance with NEGenR
1.3(a)(1)(B) as appropriate for restricted or sealed documents.
6.
Depositions. The following procedures shall be followed at all depositions to
protect the integrity of all CONFIDENTIAL information:
a) Only qualified recipients may be present at a deposition in which CONFIDENTIAL
information is disclosed or discussed.
b) All testimony elicited during a deposition at which CONFIDENTIAL information is
disclosed or discussed is deemed to be CONFIDENTIAL information and the transcript
shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL.
c) Material designated as Confidential may be used at a nonparty deposition
only if necessary to the testimony of the witness and after a written request as set forth
herein.
d) During a deposition, a confidential designation can be made at any time
when counsel reasonably believes that testimony regarding confidential information is
about to be provided, or alternatively, has been provided. If a party fails to designate
deposition testimony as confidential during a deposition, counsel shall nevertheless have
ten (10) days following receipt of the deposition transcript to designate any testimony set
forth therein as confidential.
7.
Trial. Prior to the trial of this action, the attorneys for the parties shall meet and
attempt to agree on an appropriate form of order to submit to the Court regarding the confidential
status, if any, to be afforded documents, testimony or other information disclosed during the
course of the trial.
8.
Return or Destruction of Documents. Upon final termination of this proceeding,
including all appeals, each party and other Qualified Recipient shall at its option destroy or
return to the producing party all original materials produced and designated as CONFIDENTIAL
information, and shall destroy, in whatever form stored or reproduced, all other materials
Page 3 of 4
including, but not limited to, pleadings, correspondence, memoranda, notes and other work
product materials that contain or refer to CONFIDENTIAL information. This Protective Order
shall survive the final termination of this action, and shall be binding on the parties and their
legal counsel at all times in the future.
9.
Modification. This Order is entered without prejudice to the right of any party to
apply to the Court for additional protective, or to relax or rescind any restrictions imposed by this
Order when convenience or necessity requires. The existence of this Protective Order shall not
be used by any party as a basis for discovery that is not otherwise proper under the Neb. Ct. R.
Disc. Inadvertent production by a party or third party of privileged discovery material is not
intended to waive any applicable privilege. A party notified by another party or third party of
inadvertent production of privileged discovery material will return all copies of such material to
the party claiming the privilege within seven (7) days of the receipt of the notification of the
inadvertent disclosure. If the receiving party disputes the claim of privilege or the claim the
disclosure was inadvertent, the burden is on the receiving party to seek a ruling from the Court
on the applicability of the privilege before the materials can be used in any way. In the event of a
dispute about the applicability of a privilege, the material shall be treated as Confidential under
the terms of this Protective Order pending the resolution of the dispute.
10.
Additional Parties to Litigation. In the event additional parties joint or are joined
in this action, they shall not have access to CONFIDENTIAL information until the newly joined
party, by its counsel has executed and, at the request of any party, filed with the Court, its
agreement to be fully bound by this Stipulated Order.
IT IS 22, 2016.
April SO ORDER this ____ day of ____________________, COURT:
BY THE 2016.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
____________________________________
Cheryl R. Zwart
Hon. Cheryl R. Zwart,
United States Magistrate Judge
Magistrate Judge
Prepared by:
Torrey J. Gerdes, #23924
Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit &Witt, LLP
1248 “O” Street, Suite 600
Lincoln, NE 68508
402/475-1075
Attorney for Defendant
Approved By:
Kathleen M. Neary, #20212
Vincent M. Powers & Associates
411 South 13th Street, Suite 300
PO Box 84936
Lincoln, NE 68501-4936
(402) 474-8000
1334967
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?