Petties et al v. Stony Ridge Apartments et al
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting 2 and 3 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs are advised that the next step in their case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of their claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LERONE PETTIES, CAROL
PETTIES, E.P. PETTIES, I.M.
PETTIES, A.P. PETTIES, and B.P.
PETTIES,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STONY RIDGE APARTMENTS,
IRON OAKS PROPERTIES,
BRENTON T. LUETCHENS,
CINDY SIENE, and LINCOLN
HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:15CV3118
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Plaintiffs Lerone Petties and Carol Petties, non-prisoners, filed Motions for
Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Filing Nos. 2 and 3.) Upon review of Plaintiffs’
Motions, the court finds Plaintiffs are financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees.
Plaintiffs are advised that the next step in their case will be for the court to conduct an
initial review of their claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal
course of business.
DATED this 7th day of October, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?