Voss v. Ricketts et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's "Objection to and No Consent to Dismissal Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This Decision" (Filing No. 14 ), construed as a motion from relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KENNETH DEWEY VOSS, Plaintiff, v. PETE RICKETTS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:15CV3137 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, has filed an “Objection to and No Consent to Dismissal Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This Decision” (Filing No. 14), which I shall construe as a motion from relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Because Plaintiff has not, and cannot, demonstrate a ground upon which this court may relieve Plaintiff from the final judgment entered March 31, 2016, (Filing No. 13) dismissing this matter as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Objection to and No Consent to Dismissal Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This Decision” (Filing No. 14), construed as a motion from relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), is denied. DATED this 11th day of April, 2016. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?