Voss v. Ricketts et al
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's "Objection to and No Consent to Dismissal Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This Decision" (Filing No. 14 ), construed as a motion from relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KENNETH DEWEY VOSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETE RICKETTS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:15CV3137
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, has filed an “Objection to and No Consent to
Dismissal Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This
Decision” (Filing No. 14), which I shall construe as a motion from relief from
judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Because Plaintiff has not, and cannot,
demonstrate a ground upon which this court may relieve Plaintiff from the final
judgment entered March 31, 2016, (Filing No. 13) dismissing this matter as frivolous
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Objection to and No Consent to Dismissal
Under the Clearfield Trust Doctrine and Demands Reconsideration of This Decision”
(Filing No. 14), construed as a motion from relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b), is denied.
DATED this 11th day of April, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?