Oliveira-Coutinho v. Frakes et al

Filing 32

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing 31 ) to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing 29 ) is granted. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing 29 ) shall be filed on or before April 17, 2017. Pursuant to NECivR 7.1(c), Defendants may reply to Plaintiff's response within seven days after Plaintiff files and serves his response. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOSE OLIVEIRA-COUTINHO, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT FRAKES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:15CV3159 ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Filing 31) to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Filing 29) is granted; 2. Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Filing 29) shall be filed on or before April 17, 2017; and 3. Pursuant to NECivR 7.1(c), Defendants may reply to Plaintiff’s response within seven days after Plaintiff files and serves his response. DATED this 15th day of February, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?