Stokes v. White

Filing 61

ORDER - 1. Defendant's Motion (Filing No. 59 ) to Extend Time to Respond toPlaintiff's Motion (Filing No. 57 ) for Partial Summary Judgment is granted; 2. Defendant shall file his response to Plaintiff's Motion (Filing No. 57 ) for Partial Summary Judgment on or before June 21, 2017; 3. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion (Filing No. 57 ) for Partial Summary Judgment may also include Defendant's reply in support of his Motion(Filing No. 55 ) for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL TEE STOKES SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT WHITE,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:16CV3027

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Defendant’s Motion (Filing No. 59) to Extend Time to Respond to
Plaintiff’s Motion (Filing No. 57) for Partial Summary Judgment is granted;
2.
Defendant shall file his response to Plaintiff’s Motion (Filing No. 57) for
Partial Summary Judgment on or before June 21, 2017;
3.
Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion (Filing No. 57) for Partial
Summary Judgment may also include Defendant’s reply in support of his Motion
(Filing No. 55) for Summary Judgment.
DATED this 7th day of June, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge