CFGenome, LLC et al v. Streck, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER - On or before February 7, 2017, both parties shall file their respective briefs on whether Streck must initially identify the trade secrets at issue. Any responsive briefs shall be filed on or before February 21, 2017. No reply briefs shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. Discovery, including the deadlines for responding to any written discovery already served, is stayed pending a ruling on the trade secret identification issue. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CFGENOME, LLC, AND a Delaware
limited liability company; and DR. M.
ROHAN FERNANDO, an individual;

4:16CV3130

Plaintiffs,
ORDER
vs.
STRECK, INC.,
Defendant.
The parties’ Rule 26(f) Report describes a case scheduling issue that must be
addressed before the court issues a final progression order; specifically, whether and to
what degree Streck must identify the trade secrets at issue before the parties engage in
written or deposition discovery. After conferring with counsel,

IT IS ORDERED:
1)
On or before February 7, 2017, both parties shall file their respective briefs
on whether Streck must initially identify the trade secrets at issue. Any responsive briefs
shall be filed on or before February 21, 2017. No reply briefs shall be filed absent leave
of the court for good cause shown.
2)
Discovery, including the deadlines for responding to any written discovery
already served, is stayed pending a ruling on the trade secret identification issue.
January 23, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge