CFGenome, LLC et al v. Streck, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER - On or before February 7, 2017, both parties shall file their respective briefs on whether Streck must initially identify the trade secrets at issue. Any responsive briefs shall be filed on or before February 21, 2017. No reply briefs shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. Discovery, including the deadlines for responding to any written discovery already served, is stayed pending a ruling on the trade secret identification issue. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CFGENOME, LLC, AND a Delaware limited liability company; and DR. M. ROHAN FERNANDO, an individual; 4:16CV3130 Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. STRECK, INC., Defendant. The parties’ Rule 26(f) Report describes a case scheduling issue that must be addressed before the court issues a final progression order; specifically, whether and to what degree Streck must identify the trade secrets at issue before the parties engage in written or deposition discovery. After conferring with counsel, IT IS ORDERED: 1) On or before February 7, 2017, both parties shall file their respective briefs on whether Streck must initially identify the trade secrets at issue. Any responsive briefs shall be filed on or before February 21, 2017. No reply briefs shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. 2) Discovery, including the deadlines for responding to any written discovery already served, is stayed pending a ruling on the trade secret identification issue. January 23, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?