Hunt v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER - The parties shall review the undersigned magistrate judge's practices posted at Civil Case Management Practices. Counsel for the parties shall confer and, on or before March 2, 2017, they shall jointly file a Form 35 (Rule 26 (f)) R eport, a copy of which can be found at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms in Word and WordPerfect format. If one or more of the parties believes a planning conference is needed to complete the Rule 26(f) Report, or if the parties cannot agree on o ne or more of the deadlines identified or case progression issues raised in the Rule 26(f) Report, on or before February 21, 2017 a party shall contact my chambers at (402) 437-1670, or by email addressed to zwart@ned.uscourts.gov, to arrange a conference call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ADAM L. HUNT,
Plaintiff,
4:16CV3188
vs.
ORDER
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC, FIRST
ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND
SERVICES, CORP., AND KABREDLOS
PROPERTY, INC.,
Defendants.
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
The parties shall review the undersigned magistrate judge’s practices
posted at Civil Case Management Practices.
2)
Counsel for the parties shall confer and, on or before March 2, 2017, they
shall jointly file a Form 35 (Rule 26 (f)) Report, a copy of which can be
found at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms in Word and WordPerfect
format.
3)
If one or more of the parties believes a planning conference is needed to
complete the Rule 26(f) Report, or if the parties cannot agree on one or
more of the deadlines identified or case progression issues raised in the
Rule 26(f) Report, on or before February 21, 2017 a party shall contact my
chambers at (402) 437-1670, or by email addressed to
zwart@ned.uscourts.gov, to arrange a conference call.
Dated this 31st day of January, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?