Oglesby v. Lesan et al

Filing 95

ORDER denying as moot 69 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order; granting 92 Motion for Leave to file a reply; and resolving 74 Motion for Protective Order and 77 Motion to Quash as stated on the record 94 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROBERT OGLESBY, Plaintiff, 4:16CV3189 vs. ORDER AMY LESAN, and CHAD HEIN, Defendants. After conferring with counsel, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff’s motion to file a reply brief, (Filing No. 92), is granted and the reply brief has been considered in ruling on the parties’ pending discovery motions. 2) Defendant’s motion to quash, (Filing No. 69), the arguments of which were also raised in Defendant’s amended motion to quash, is denied as moot. 3) As to the issues raised in Defendants’ motion for protective order and their amended motion to quash, or in the alternative, motion for protective order, (Filing Nos. 74 and 77), the court’s rulings are stated on the record, (Filing No. 94). 4) On or before August 25, 2017, the parties shall forward their proposed protective order, in an MS Word format and drafted in accordance with the court’s oral rulings, to zwart@ned.uscourts.gov. August 22, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?