Oglesby v. Lesan et al

Filing 95

ORDER denying as moot 69 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order; granting 92 Motion for Leave to file a reply; and resolving 74 Motion for Protective Order and 77 Motion to Quash as stated on the record 94 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ROBERT OGLESBY,
Plaintiff,

4:16CV3189

vs.
ORDER
AMY LESAN, and CHAD HEIN,
Defendants.
After conferring with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Plaintiff’s motion to file a reply brief, (Filing No. 92), is granted and
the reply brief has been considered in ruling on the parties’ pending discovery
motions.
2)
Defendant’s motion to quash, (Filing No. 69), the arguments of which
were also raised in Defendant’s amended motion to quash, is denied as moot.
3)
As to the issues raised in Defendants’ motion for protective order
and their amended motion to quash, or in the alternative, motion for protective
order, (Filing Nos. 74 and 77), the court’s rulings are stated on the record, (Filing
No. 94).
4)
On or before August 25, 2017, the parties shall forward their
proposed protective order, in an MS Word format and drafted in accordance with
the court’s oral rulings, to [e-mail].
August 22, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge

2