Wang Anderson v. The State of Nebraska et al

Filing 666

ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to extend (filing 665 ) is denied. The plaintiff's claims against Lisa A. Johnson are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), and Johnson is terminated as a party. The plaintiff's claims against John Does 1-15 are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), and they are terminated as parties. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party) (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CATHERINE YANG WANG ANDERSON, 4:17-CV-3073 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion to extend (filing 665) and the Court's own order to show cause of May 27, 2020 (filing 659). The Court will deny the motion to extend, and dismiss Lisa A. Johnson and John Does 1-15 as defendants. The Court has already explained, in some detail, why the plaintiff's need to retain new counsel does not justify further delay in the progression of this case. See filing 664. Service of process on Johnson was plainly deficient. See filing 659 at 2-3. And there is no reason to believe, three years into this case, that the "John Doe" defendants will ever be identified, much less served with process. Accordingly, cause not having been shown, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff's motion to extend (filing 665) is denied. 2. The plaintiff's claims against Lisa A. Johnson are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), and Johnson is terminated as a party. 3. The plaintiff's claims against John Does 1-15 are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), and they are terminated as parties. Dated this 9th day of June, 2020. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard Chief United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?