Bushansky v. Barker et al

Filing 9

ORDER that plaintiff shall have until November 6, 2017 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STEPHEN BUSHANSKY, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; 4:17CV3083 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. THOMAS B. BARKER, LEE ADREAN, DONALD M. CASEYJR., ANTHONY J. DINOVI, PAUL R. GARCIA, LAURA A. GRATTAN, JEANETTE A. HORAN, MICHAEL A. HUBER, DIANE E. OFFEREINS, GREGORY T. SLOMA, and WEST CORPORATION, Defendants. Pursuant to the court’s rules, a complaint must be served within 90 days of filing the lawsuit. Plaintiff has not filed a return of service indicating service on Defendants, and none of the Defendants have voluntarily appeared. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until November 6, 2017 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Dated this 5th day of October, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?