Reynolds v. Greggs
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this action is remanded to the County Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The plaintiff, Tyler Reynolds, sued the defendant, Kimberly Greggs, in
Lancaster County Court for an alleged breach of the parties' lease agreement.
See filing 1 at 8-10. The defendant has removed the case to federal court
under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), which allows a party to remove a claim that arises
under federal law.1 In doing so, the defendant suggests that because she is
protected by federal statutes, including the Americans with Disabilities Act,
the Court has original jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state-law complaint.
Filing 1 at 3.
But this contention is misplaced. Indeed, whether a claim arises under
federal law must be determined by reference to the well-pleaded complaint,
and "[a] defense that raises a federal question is inadequate to confer federal
jurisdiction." Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 808 (1986).
Thus, because the federal question is not housed in the plaintiff's well-
The plaintiff has not moved to remand the case. But the Court is obligated to consider
subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte where, as here, there is reason to suspect that such
jurisdiction is lacking. Hart v. United States, 630 F.3d 1085, 1089 (8th Cir. 2011).
pleaded complaint, the Court does not have federal question jurisdiction.2
Accordingly, the case will be remanded to the Lancaster County Court.
IT IS ORDERED that this action is remanded to the County Court of
Lancaster County, Nebraska.
Dated this 17th day of July, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
Nor is there diversity of citizenship such that removal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. §
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?