Pyzer v. Berryhill

Filing 17

ORDER that the Plaintiff shall file a motion for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by November 20, 2017. Defendant shall file a motion for an order affirming the Com missioner's decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by December 20, 2017. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by January 3, 2018. The parties' briefs shall comply with the requirements set forth in the General Order. This case shall be ripe for decision on January 4, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARIE ILENE PYZER, Plaintiff, 4:17CV3094 vs. ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. This is an action challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The answer and administrative record have been filed and the parties have consented to disposition by the undersigned magistrate judge. The case will be progressed according to General Order No. 2015-05: In the Matter of Procedures for Social Security Cases (Filing No. 6). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall file a motion for an order reversing the Commissioner’s decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by November 20, 2017; 2. Defendant shall file a motion for an order affirming the Commissioner’s decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by December 20, 2017; 3. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by January 3, 2018; 4. The parties’ briefs shall comply with the requirements set forth in the General Order; 5. This case shall be ripe for decision on January 4, 2018. Dated this 27th day of October, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?