Reimer v. Berryhill
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff Karen Reimer shall have until February 12, 2018 to show cause why her complaint should not be dismissed for failure to follow the required procedures. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KAREN J. REIMER,
Plaintiff,
4:17CV3136
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Karen J. Reimer’s (“Reimer”)
Complaint (Filing No. 1) against defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of
Social Security (“Commissioner”). Reimer contends the Commissioner’s final decision
to deny Reimer’s claim for benefits “is erroneous as a matter of law and unsupported by
substantial evidence.”
Under General Order No. 2015-05, 1 a plaintiff who wishes to challenge a final
decision of the Commissioner must move for an order reversing the Commissioner’s
decision within thirty days after the filing of the administrative record.
In this case, the Commissioner filed the administrative record on December 19,
2017. Reimer has not filed the required motion within the thirty day period or requested
any extension of the deadline. Accordingly, Reimer shall have until February 12, 2018,
to show cause why her Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to follow the
required procedures.
1
The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge of the United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska, issued General Order No. 2015-05 on November 16,
2015. The Order sets forth the governing procedures for all actions filed after January 1,
2016, challenging “a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 31st day of January, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?