Starostka Group Unlimited, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
Filing
19
ORDER that Defendant is given until April 13, 2018 to show cause why the court should not enter a default and/or default judgment against Defendant. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in the court entering a default or a judgment of default against The Hanover Insurance Company without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STAROSTKA GROUP UNLIMITED,
INC., a Nebraska corporation, United
States of America for the use and
benefit of;
Plaintiff,
4:18CV3004
ORDER
vs.
THE HANOVER INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
The parties’ Rule 26(f) report stated the parties will be prepared to further
discuss settlement on March 1, 2018. (Filing No. 13, at CM/ECF pp. 3-4, § III). As
such, the court noticed and convened a hearing to be held on March 1, 2018.
(See Filing No. 15, ¶3). Defense counsel neither attended that hearing, nor
explained his absence. The court re-scheduled the telephonic hearing for March
23, 2018. (See Filing No. 18). Defense counsel did not attend and during the
following week, he has not contacted my chambers to explain his absence.
Mandatory disclosures were due on March 9, 2018. (Filing No. 15, at
CM/ECF p. 2, ¶ 4). Plaintiff has filed a certificate of service stating its mandatory
disclosures were served. Defendant has not.
Under the circumstances presented,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant is given until April 13, 2018 to show cause
why the court should not enter a default and/or default judgment against
Defendant. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in the court
entering a default or a judgment of default against The Hanover Insurance
Company without further notice.
March 30, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?