Yanga v. State of Nebraska et al
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: Petitioner shall file an amended petition in this case attacking only one of the separate state convictions and he shall file a new petition in a separate federal case attacking the other separate state conviction. Each petition should attack only one of the state convictions. Petitioner is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in both federal cases-this one and the new case yet to be filed. Petitioner must file the amended petition in this ca se and the new petition no later than March 6, 2018. That means the documents must be received by the Clerk of Court on or before that date and the prison mail box rule will not otherwise apply. The Clerk shall mail two copies of the habeas corpus petition forms to the Petitioner. My chambers shall call this matter to my attention on March 7, 2018. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with two Habeas Corpus Petition forms)(TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
EMMANUEL S. YANGA,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, and DIR.
SCOTT FRAKES, (Warden)
Madison,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:18CV3009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This case comes on for initial review of a habeas corpus petition. However,
because the judgments of conviction attacked involve two separate courts–one being
the County Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska (county court # CR 14-1708, appeal
to district court # CR 15-552 and appeal to the Nebraska Court of Appeals # A-17728) and the other being the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska (district
court #CR14-1382 and appeal to the Nebraska Court of Appeals #A-17-655), the
petition is improper.
Rule 2(e) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States
District Courts states: “A petitioner who seeks relief from judgments of more than one
state court must file a separate petition covering the judgment or judgments of each
court.”
Therefore, Petitioner must start over. In this case (4:18CV3009) he must file an
amended petition attacking only one state case. He can choose either case. He may at
the same time file a second separate petition attacking the other state case. Since he
has been allowed to proceed in forma pauperis here, he will be allowed to proceed in
forma pauperis when he files the new habeas case.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Petitioner shall file an amended petition in this case attacking only one
of the separate state convictions and he shall file a new petition in a
separate federal case attacking the other separate state conviction. Each
petition should attack only one of the state convictions.
2.
Petitioner is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in both federal
cases–this one and the new case yet to be filed.
3.
Petitioner must file the amended petition in this case and the new petition
no later than March 6, 2018. That means the documents must be received
by the Clerk of Court on or before that date and the prison mail box rule
will not otherwise apply.
4.
The Clerk shall mail two copies of the habeas corpus petition forms to
the Petitioner.
5.
My chambers shall call this matter to my attention on March 7, 2018.
DATED this 5th day of February, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?