Brown v. Doel et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the delay in accomplishing service of process on Dr. Kasselman in his individual capacity due to the federal government shutdown will not count against the 90-day time limit for service of the amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). When the Marshals Service is able to resume service of civil summons, the court will monitor this case to see that service on Dr. Kasselman is accomplished within a reasonable time and, if necessary, will enter further order direct ing the Marshals Service to complete service by a date certain. Once service upon Dr. Kasselman in his individual capacity is accomplished, the court will enter a progression order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JESUS BROWN,
Plaintiff,
4:18CV3020
vs.
DR. DEOL, Nebraska Department of
Correctional Services Medical Director,
individually and in their offiacl
capacities; GARY J. HUSTAD, MD,
individually and in their offiacl
capacities; DAN DANAHER, Physician
Assistant, individually and in their
offiacl capacities; and DR. JEFFREY
KASSELMAN, in his individual and
official capacity;
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on case management. On October 25, 2018,
the court permitted Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Dr. Jeffrey
Kasselman in his individual and official capacities to proceed to service of process
and directed the Marshals Service to serve Dr. Kasselman. (Filing No. 28.) Service
on Dr. Kasselman in his official capacity was accomplished on November 28, 2018
(filing no. 30), and he filed an answer in his official capacity only on December 18,
2018 (filing no. 31). To date, service on Dr. Kasselman in his individual capacity
has not been accomplished. Upon consulting with the Marshals Service, the court
has been made aware that service on Dr. Kasselman in his individual capacity has
been delayed due to the federal government shutdown and the restrictions on the
types of matters the Marshals Service may expend resources on during the
shutdown. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
The delay in accomplishing service of process on Dr. Kasselman in
his individual capacity due to the federal government shutdown will not count
against the 90-day time limit for service of the amended complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 4(m).
2.
When the Marshals Service is able to resume service of civil
summons, the court will monitor this case to see that service on Dr. Kasselman is
accomplished within a reasonable time and, if necessary, will enter further order
directing the Marshals Service to complete service by a date certain.
3.
Once service upon Dr. Kasselman in his individual capacity is
accomplished, the court will enter a progression order.
Dated this 15th day of January, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?