Lambert v. Costello

Filing 29

ORDER - that Defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Deadlines (Filing No. 28 ) is granted. The progression order has been amended as follows: 1) Defendant's deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the tria l, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)) is now January 15, 2019. 2) Defendant's deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at tri al, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is now February 15, 2019. 3) The deposition deadline is now January 31, 2019. 4) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is February 28, 2019. 5) Any remaining deadlines are unchanged. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DOUGLAS LAMBERT, an individual; Plaintiff, 4:18CV3038 vs. ORDER MAURICE W. COSTELLO, an individual; Defendant. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Continue Deadlines (Filing No. 28) is granted. The progression order has been amended as follows: 1) Defendant’s deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and nonretained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)) is now January 15, 2019. 2) Defendant’s deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is now February 15, 2019. 3) The deposition deadline is now January 31, 2019. 4) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is February 28, 2019. 5) Any remaining deadlines are unchanged. Dated this 15th day of October, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?