McNeil v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business and will address Petitioners other pending motions at that time. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMAAL ANDRE MCNEIL, Petitioner, 4:18CV3041 vs. STATE OF NEBRASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, DOUGLAS COUNTY ATTORNEY, WARDEN OF N.S.P., SCOTT FRANKS, Director of N.S.P.; LEE ANN RETELSDORF, District Court Judge, Mrs.; and CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Respondents. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1) and a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2). Habeas corpus cases attacking the legality of a person’s confinement require the payment of a $5.00 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). However, after considering Petitioner’s financial status as shown in the records of this court (see inmate trust account statement at Filing No. 26), leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and Petitioner is relieved from paying the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business and will address Petitioner’s other pending motions at that time. Dated this 30th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?