McNeil v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 55

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's correspondence, construed as a motion for records (filing no. 53 ), is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMAAL ANDRE MCNEIL, Petitioner, 4:18CV3041 vs. STATE OF NEBRASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, DOUGLAS COUNTY ATTORNEY, WARDEN OF N.S.P., SCOTT FRANKS, Director of N.S.P.; LEE ANN RETELSDORF, District Court Judge, Mrs.; and CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Respondents. This closed habeas matter is before the court on correspondence dated October 18, 2019 from Petitioner, which the court construes as a motion for records. (Filing No. 53.) Petitioner requests that all records related to his habeas petition be sent to the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court for that Court’s review.1 On April 30, 2019, the court received notice that Petitioner had filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. (Filing No. 51.) Petitioner’s petition for certiorari was denied on October 7, 2019, as was his petition for rehearing on December 9, 2019. (Filing No. 52; Filing No. 54.) Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: Petitioner’s correspondence, construed as a motion for records (filing no. 53), is denied as moot. 1 Pursuant to U.S.Sup.Ct. Rule 26, a petitioner is not required to submit a joint appendix of the records from the lower courts until after an order has been entered by the U.S. Supreme Court granting certiorari. Dated this 6th day of March, 2020. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?