McNeil v. State of Nebraska et al
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's correspondence, construed as a motion for records (filing no. 53 ), is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JAMAAL ANDRE MCNEIL,
Petitioner,
4:18CV3041
vs.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
NEBRASKA, DOUGLAS COUNTY
ATTORNEY, WARDEN OF N.S.P.,
SCOTT FRANKS, Director of N.S.P.;
LEE ANN RETELSDORF, District Court
Judge, Mrs.; and CLERK OF THE
DISTRICT COURT,
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Respondents.
This closed habeas matter is before the court on correspondence dated
October 18, 2019 from Petitioner, which the court construes as a motion for
records. (Filing No. 53.) Petitioner requests that all records related to his habeas
petition be sent to the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court for that Court’s
review.1 On April 30, 2019, the court received notice that Petitioner had filed a
petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. (Filing No. 51.)
Petitioner’s petition for certiorari was denied on October 7, 2019, as was his
petition for rehearing on December 9, 2019. (Filing No. 52; Filing No. 54.)
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that: Petitioner’s correspondence, construed as a motion
for records (filing no. 53), is denied as moot.
1
Pursuant to U.S.Sup.Ct. Rule 26, a petitioner is not required to submit a joint
appendix of the records from the lower courts until after an order has been entered by the
U.S. Supreme Court granting certiorari.
Dated this 6th day of March, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?