Sullivan v. York General Health Care Services
Filing
52
PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) - that the parties' Joint Motion to Continue Progression Order dates (Filing No. 51 ) is granted. The final progression order is amended as follows: The status conference set in Filing No. 47 will be held, as scheduled, on February 25, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., by telephone. The deposition deadline is March 18, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JAMES A. SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,
4:18CV3055
vs.
YORK GENERAL HEALTH CARE
SERVICES,
PROGRESSION ORDER
(AMENDED)
Defendant.
IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue Progression
Order dates (Filing No. 51) is granted. The final progression order is amended as
follows:
1) The status conference set in Filing No. 47 will be held, as scheduled, on
February 25, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., by telephone.
2) Motions to compel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by
March 13, 2020.
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order
shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned
magistrate judge.
3) The deposition deadline is March 18, 2020.
4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss or motions for summary
judgment is not March 27, 2020.
5) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and
related grounds is March 27, 2020.
6) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall
be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge. Such requests will not
be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely
progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances,
unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require additional
time be allowed.
Dated this 5th day of February, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?