Bonnell et al v. Karels et al

Filing 30

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff's claims against Does 1 through 25 are dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Does 1 through 25 are terminated as parties. This case is dismissed. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (TCL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KATHLEEN T. BONNELL,
Plaintiff,

4:18-CV-3066

vs.

ORDER

GREAT WESTERN BANCORP, INC.,
et. al.,
Defendants.

The Court previously ordered the plaintiff to show cause why twenty-five
unnamed "John Doe" defendants should not be dismissed for failure to serve
process. Filing 27. The plaintiff has responded by showing that Great Western
Bancorp was served with process. See filing 28. And the plaintiff has filed a
brief contending that "Great Western Bancorp was and is the only Defendant
in the above captioned case." Filing 29 at 1.
It suffices to say that the plaintiff has not shown cause why her claims,
if any, against "Does 1 through 25" should not be dismissed. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The plaintiff's claims against Does 1 through 25 are
dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

2.

Does 1 through 25 are terminated as parties.

3.

This case is dismissed.

4.

A separate judgment will be entered.

Dated this 21st day of December, 2018.
BY THE COURT:

John M. Gerrard
Chief United States District Judge

2