Cole v. Cotton et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (Filing 13 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA FRANKIE LEVI COLE, 4:21CV3062 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vs. ROSALYN COTTON, et al., Defendants. On August 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “motion for order addressing all elements of operative complaint ‘relief requested’ section of case pleadings” (Filing 13). This case was dismissed without prejudice on July 6, 2021—more than a year ago—after Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint as ordered by the court. See Filings 10 and 11. Liberally construing Filing 13 as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it will be denied because Plaintiff has not demonstrated there are any extraordinary circumstances justifying relief. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 777-78 (2017). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (Filing 13) is denied. Dated this 2nd day of August 2022. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?