Cole v. Cotton et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (Filing 13 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
FRANKIE LEVI COLE,

4:21CV3062

Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

vs.
ROSALYN COTTON, et al.,
Defendants.

On August 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “motion for order addressing all elements
of operative complaint ‘relief requested’ section of case pleadings” (Filing 13).
This case was dismissed without prejudice on July 6, 2021—more than a year
ago—after Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint as ordered by the court. See
Filings 10 and 11.
Liberally construing Filing 13 as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule
60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it will be denied because Plaintiff has
not demonstrated there are any extraordinary circumstances justifying relief. See
Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 777-78 (2017).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (Filing 13)
is denied.
Dated this 2nd day of August 2022.
BY THE COURT:

Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge