Heil v. Batie Cattle Company
Filing
82
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order (filing 72 ) is overruled. Ordered by Senior Judge John M. Gerrard. (TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LAUREN HEIL, Personal
Representative of the Estate of
BRADLEY HEIL,
Plaintiff,
4:23-CV-3170
vs.
ORDER
BATIE CATTLE COMPANY, a
Nebraska corporation,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant's objection (filing 72) to
the Magistrate Judge's amendment to the case progression order (filing 66)
extending the time for the parties to identify expert witnesses. See NECivR
72.2(a). The Court will overrule the objection.
A district court may reconsider a magistrate judge's ruling on
nondispositive pretrial matters where it has been shown that the ruling is
clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(a); Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068, 1076 (8th Cir. 2007). The
Magistrate Judge determined that the plaintiff had exercised reasonable
diligence, the plaintiff had shown good cause to extend the pending deadline,
and the defendant would not be prejudiced by the extension. Filing 67; see
Marmo v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., 457 F.3d 748, 759 (8th Cir. 2006).
Having reviewed the record and considered the defendant's objection, the
Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order was neither clearly erroneous
nor contrary to law. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Objection to the Magistrate
Judge's Order (filing 72) is overruled.
Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?