Dietrich et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
Filing
28
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) - The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral testimony only under Rule 45, is June 30, 2025. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. The status conference to di scuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings currently set for March 4, 2025 is continued and will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on July 8, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CRYSTAL DIETRICH, Wife; and OAK
DIETRICH, Husband;
4:24CV3030
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER
(AMENDED)
WALMART, INC., a Delaware Corporation;
and SWIRE PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC., a
Delaware Corporation;
Defendants.
The Court grants the parties’ Joint Motion for Amended Progression Order. Filing
No. 26.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order is amended as follows:
1)
The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. The status
conference to discuss case progression, the parties’ interest in settlement,
and the trial and pretrial conference settings currently set for March 4, 2025
is continued and will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on July
8, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing
instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference.
2)
The deadlines for moving to amend pleadings or add parties are:
For the defendant(s):
January 24, 2025.
1
3)
The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36 and
45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is July 25, 2025. Motions to
compel written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by
August 8, 2025.
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order
shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned
magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute.
4)
The deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial,
(both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained
experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is February 28, 2025.
5)
The deadlines for complete expert disclosures1 for all experts expected to
testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and nonretained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s):
February 28, 2025.
For the defendant(s):
June 30, 2025.
6)
The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral
testimony only under Rule 45, is June 30, 2025.
7)
The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary
judgment is September 12, 2025.
8)
The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related
grounds is September 12, 2025.
9)
Motions in limine shall be filed twenty-eight days before trial. It is not
the normal practice to hold hearings on motions in limine or to rule on them
prior to the first day of trial. Counsel should plan accordingly.
10)
All other deadlines and provisions in the Court’s prior final progression
order, Filing No. 17, not amended herein remain unchanged.
1
While treating medical and mental health care providers are generally not
considered “specially retained experts,” not all their opinions relate to the care and
treatment of a patient. Their opinion testimony is limited to what is stated within their
treatment documentation. As to each such expert, any opinions which are not stated
within that expert’s treatment records and reports must be separately and timely
disclosed.
2
Dated this 27th day of January, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?