Ray v. Central Garden and Pet Company, et al

Filing 81

ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion to Extend Deposition Deadline to Conduct 30(b)(6) Deposition (Filing No. 79 ) is granted. The plaintiff shall have until April 3, 2009, to conduct a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition of the defendant Penningto n Seed, Inc. of Nebraska. However, the duces tecum request is limited to policies and manuals of the company, together with documents already produced. The witness may be asked to list other documents.Thereafter, the parties may apply to the court to determine the scope of any additional production. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GINGER RAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, ) PENNINGTON SEED, INC. and ) PENNINGTON SEED OF NEBRASKA, INC)., ) Defendants. ) 7:07CV5016 ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's Motion to Extend Deposition Deadline to Conduct 30(b)(6) Deposition (Filing No. 79). The defendants filed a brief (Filing No. 80) in response. On March 23, 2009, the court held a telephone conference with counsel for the parties regarding the motion. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff's Motion to Extend Deposition Deadline to Conduct 30(b)(6) Deposition (Filing No. 79) is granted. 2. The plaintiff shall have until April 3, 2009, to conduct a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition of the defendant Pennington Seed, Inc. of Nebraska. However, the duces tecum request is limited to policies and manuals of the company, together with documents already produced. The witness may be asked to list other documents. Thereafter, the parties may apply to the court to determine the scope of any additional production. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?