Pohl v. Furnas County

Filing 58

ORDER granting 57 Motion to Extend Deadline; however, however, the parties are strongly encouraged to file necessary discovery motions as they become ripe for decision, and prior to 10/15/2010, if possible. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )

Download PDF
- F G 3 Pohl v. Furnas County D o c . 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA J U S T O N POHL, P l a i n t i f f, vs. C O U N T Y OF FURNAS, a Nebraska P o litic a l Subdivision, D efe n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 7 :0 8 C V 5 0 1 1 ORDER T h is matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion (#57) to extend the deadline f o r filing discovery motions to October 15, 2010, which is the deposition deadline. Plaintiff's c o u n se l advised that the motion is unopposed. P a ra g ra p h 2(c) of the final progression order (#51) provides: "Discovery motions s h a ll be filed not later than July 30, 2010 as to matters which are then ripe for decision; d is c o v e ry matters arising after that date may be the subject of motions until the deposition d e a d lin e ." One purpose for the interim deadline is to ensure that the schedule for filing m o tio n s for summary judgment is not delayed by discovery disputes. The deadline for filing m o tio n s for summary judgment is October 29, 2010. T h e court finds that the motion should be granted; however, the parties are strongly e n c o u ra g e d to file necessary discovery motions as they become ripe for decision, and prior to October 15, 2010, if possible. D A T E D July 29, 2010. B Y THE COURT: s / F.A. Gossett U n ite d States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?