Baker v. Katana, et al.

Filing 31

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Discovery and for Appropriate Sanctions (filing 30 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DANIEL R. BAKER, Plaintiff, V. KATANA, INC., an Iowa Corporation, and STEVEN K. ZEIBIG, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 7:09CV3183 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Compelling Discovery and for Appropriate Sanctions (filing 30). The motion will be denied. Plaintiff represents to the court that he served Defendants with written discovery requests on February 19, 2010, and that Defendants have failed to respond. The progression order entered in this case (filing 25) provides that “[d]iscovery motions shall be filed not later than December 3, 2010 as to matters which are then ripe for decision; discovery matters arising after that date may be the subject of motions until the deposition deadline.” (Filing 25 at CM/ECF pp. 1-2.) Based on the timeline of events, it is likely that any motion to compel related to the discovery at issue here was ripe for decision as of the December 3, 2010 deadline. Further, the deposition deadline was January 14, 2011. Plaintiff did not file this motion until May 4, 2011. Accordingly, this motion will be denied as untimely. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Compelling Discovery and for Appropriate Sanctions (filing 30) is denied. DATED June 9, 2011. BY THE COURT: S/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?