Mangan v. Newlon et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 71 Motion for Leave; Maren Lynn Chaloupka and the Chaloupka, Holyoke, Hofmeister, Snyder & Chaloupka, LLC law firm are granted leave to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff; The defendants shall have to on or before May 13, 2010, to file a response to the plaintiffs 75 Motion to Continue and Extend Deadlines in Final Progression Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CHRISTINA M. MANGAN, Plaintiff, vs. LLOYD B. NEWLON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 7:09CV5000 ORDER This matter is before the court on the Motion of Maren Lynn Chaloupka for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for the Plaintiff (Filing No. 71). Substitute counsel has now entered an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw will be granted. Additionally, the plaintiff seeks a six-month extension of all deadlines established in the November 24, 2009 scheduling order (Filing No. 62). See Filing No. 75. The defendants shall have a reasonable opportunity to respond to the plaintiff's motion for a continuance of the deadlines. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Motion of Maren Lynn Chaloupka for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for the Plaintiff (Filing No. 71) is granted for good cause shown pursuant to NEGenR 1.3(f). Maren Lynn Chaloupka and the Chaloupka, Holyoke, Hofmeister, Snyder & Chaloupka, LLC law firm are granted leave to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall stop all electronic notices to this attorney regarding this case. 2. The defendants shall have to on or before May 13, 2010, to file a response to the plaintiff's Motion to Continue and Extend Deadlines in Final Progression Order (Filing No. 75). DATED this 6th day of May, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?