Scroggins et al v. C. R. England, Inc. et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 137 Motion for Protective Order. Defendants' motion for a continuance of the expert deadline, (filing no. 144 ), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ROSANNE SCROGGINS, and
C. R. ENGLAND, INC., a Utah
corporation, and ROBERT J. DALY JR.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
After conferring with the parties:
IT IS ORDERED:
The defendants’ motion for protective order, (filing no. 137), is granted in part
and denied in part as follows:
On or before March 8, 2012, plaintiffs’ counsel shall provide defense
counsel with a concise list of the information being sought in the pending
written discovery served on the defendants. Counsel shall confer to
resolve any issues related to the discovery of the matters listed by the
plaintiffs and if issues remain, they shall contact the court to schedule a
conference call to present their respective arguments and obtain a ruling.
Due to the magnitude of written discovery to which the defendants have
already filed a response, the plaintiffs must have a good cause basis for
serving any future written discovery. That is, the plaintiffs are not
prohibited from serving additional written discovery, but if they do so,
upon motion by the defendant, the discovery requests will be stricken
absent a showing by the plaintiffs that the information requested is
necessary for their case preparation or trial.
Defendants’ motion for a continuance of the expert deadline, (filing no. 144), is
February 22, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?