Harchelroad Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - 1) The Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court and Motion to Stay Motion to Dismiss, (filing no. 26 ), is granted in part and denied in part as fol lows: a. The defendants have now filed their response to the plaintiffs motion to stay and, accordingly, their motion for an extension of time to file that response is denied as moot. b. The defendants' motion for additional time to respond to t he plaintiff's motion for remand is granted, and defendants response to the plaintiff's motion for remand shall be filed on or before April 14, 2011. c. Any reply to defendants response to plaintiff's motion for remand shall be filed s even calendar days after the filing of defendants' response. 2) In the interest of judicial economy, the plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings, including any response to defendants' pending motion to dismiss, (filing no. 23 ), is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HARCHELROAD MOTORS, INC., a
Nebraska Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS
INSURANCE COMPANY, ZURICH
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
and CHARLES CHASE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

7:11CV5002

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:
1)

The Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's
Motion to Remand to State Court and Motion to Stay Motion to Dismiss, (filing no.
26), is granted in part and denied in part as follows:
a.

b.

The defendants’ motion for additional time to respond to the plaintiff’s
motion for remand is granted, and defendants’ response to the plaintiff’s
motion for remand shall be filed on or before April 14, 2011.

c.

2)

The defendants have now filed their response to the plaintiff’s motion to stay
and, accordingly, their motion for an extension of time to file that response
is denied as moot.

Any reply to defendants’ response to plaintiff’s motion for remand shall be
filed seven calendar days after the filing of defendants’ response.

In the interest of judicial economy, the plaintiff’s motion to stay proceedings,
including any response to defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, (filing no. 23), is
granted.

April 11, 2011

BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge