Loman v. Shepherd et al

Filing 19

ORDER - Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted at this time. The Court may, however, reconsider this ruling at a later point in this litigation should it appear that appointment of counsel is necessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CAROL G LOMAN, Plaintiff, V. ZACHARY P SHEPHERD, and MARCIE R DOAK, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 7:13CV5007 ORDER This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on or about September 21, 2009. Plaintiff filed this suit against Defendant Zachary Shepherd on August 8, 2013, alleging that Mr. Shepherd acted negligently and caused the accident in question. Mr. Shepherd has now moved the Court for appointment of counsel. (Filing 18.) A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to a court-appointed attorney. However, the court may make such an appointment at its discretion, taking into account the factual and legal complexity of the case. Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted at this time. The Court may, however, reconsider this ruling at a later point in this litigation should it appear that appointment of counsel is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED December 31, 2013. BY THE COURT: S/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?