City of Benkelman, Nebraska v. Baseline Engineering Corporation et al

Filing 83

JUDGMENT granting 81 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice between Plaintiff City of Benkelman, Nebraska, and Defendant Baseline Engineering Corporation. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims asserted by Plaintiff City of Benkelman, Nebraska, against Defendant Baseline Engineering Corporation in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice. Defendant Baseline Engineering Corporation is dismissed as a party to this action, and the Clerk of Court shall indicate on the court's electronic docket sheet that such Defendant is terminated as a party to this case. Each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce t he terms of the parties' settlement agreement. The City of Benkelman's claims against Layne Christensen Company and Christensen's counterclaims against the City remain pending. Therefore, this Judgment does not terminate the case. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KMG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CITY OF BENKELMAN,
NEBRASKA, A Political
Subdivision,
Plaintiff,
v.
BASELINE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION, A Colorado
Corporation, and LAYNE
CHRISTENSEN COMPANY, A
Delaware Corporation,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

7:15CV5003

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Filing No. 81)
between Plaintiff City of Benkelman, Nebraska, and Defendant Baseline Engineering
Corporation,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Filing No. 81)
between Plaintiff City of Benkelman, Nebraska, and Defendant Baseline Engineering
Corporation is granted;
2.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims asserted by Plaintiff
City of Benkelman, Nebraska, against Defendant Baseline Engineering Corporation
in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice;

3.
Defendant Baseline Engineering Corporation is dismissed as a party to
this action, and the Clerk of Court shall indicate on the court’s electronic docket sheet
that such Defendant is terminated as a party to this case;
4.
Each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and
expenses; and
5.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’
settlement agreement.
6.
The City of Benkelman's claims against Layne Christensen Company and
Christensen's counterclaims against the City remain pending. Therefore, this Judgment
does not terminate the case.
DATED this 23rd day of August, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

2