USA v. Dravo Corporation, et al
Filing
304
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on an unopposed motion for settlement to Enter Consent Decree, Filing No. 301, and notice of lodging of proposed consent, Filing No. 298 and 298-1. IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Consent Decree, Filing No. 298-1, is hereby entered as the Final Order in this case against Defendant Desco Corporation. The Court will likewise sign the actual Consent Decree, Filing No. 298-1. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
8:01CV500
vs.
FINAL ORDER
DRAVO CORPORATION, DESCO,
CORPORATION; and DESCO
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on an unopposed motion for settlement to Enter
Consent Decree, Filing No. 301, and notice of lodging of proposed consent, Filing No. 298
and 298-1. The United States requests that this Court enter the proposed Consent Decree
with Defendant Desco Corporation in accordance with Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §
9607(a), for costs incurred and to be incurred related to Operable Unit (“OU”) 01 of the
Hastings Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site (“Site”).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Consent Decree and the related documents.
The Court finds the Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, and in accordance with the CERCLA
requirements. In addition, the government asserts that no comments were received during
the 30-day public comment period.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Consent Decree, Filing No. 298-1, is hereby entered as the Final Order in
this case against Defendant Desco Corporation.
2. The Court will likewise sign the actual Consent Decree, Filing No. 298-1.
Dated this 5th day of February, 2024.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?