Holmes v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 11

ORDER - The unopposed oral motion of defendants City of Omaha, Omaha Police Department, Don Carey, Derek Mois, Rosemary Burdess, and Thomas Loftus, for an extension of time to file the report of parties' planning conference is granted. The parties are hereby given until September 19, 2005 to file their Rule 26(f) meeting report. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 8/4/2005. (GJG, )

Holmes v. City of Omaha et al

Doc. 11

Case: 8:05-cv-00369-RGK-DLP

Document #: 11

Date Filed: 08/04/2005

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DERRICK HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OMAHA, OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, DON CAREY, DEREK MOIS, DAVID WESTBROOK, ROSEMARY BURDESS, THOMAS LOFTUS, UNKNOWN SOKOLIK, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:05CV369

ORDER

The unopposed oral motion of defendants City of Omaha, Omaha Police Department, Don Carey, Derek Mois, Rosemary Burdess, and Thomas Loftus, for an extension of time to file the report of parties' planning conference is granted. report. The parties are hereby given until September 19, 2005 to file their Rule 26(f) meeting

DATED this 4th day of August, 2005. BY THE COURT: s/ David L. Piester United States Magistrate Judge

David L. Piester

Dockets.Justia.com