Abraham v. Progressive Insurance (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PURSUANT TO FILING #26)

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding motion, filing 28 . Abraham's "Motion[s] to Seal Records" filed in Case Numbers 4:99CV3233, 8:01CV580, 8:05CV246, 8:05CV533, and 8:08CV151 are denied. The court directs the clerk's office to file this Memorandum and Order in each of the five cases listed in the caption above. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA IN RE GARY L. ABRAHAM ) ) ) ) ) 4:99CV3233; 8:01CV580; 8:05CV246 8:05CV533; 8:08CV151 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Gary Lamont Abraham (“Abraham”) filed a “Motion to Seal Records” in the five cases listed in the caption of this Memorandum and Order. (See, e.g., Case No. 8:05CV533, Filing No. 28.) In this Motion, Abraham asks the court to “close” and “vacate[]” these “old settled cases.” (Id.) The court has reviewed the record in each of the five cases. Contrary to Abraham’s assertions, none of the cases are open. In addition, the court sees no reason to strike (or seal) any part of the record in any of the cases. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: Abraham’s “Motion[s] to Seal Records” filed in Case Numbers 4:99CV3233, 8:01CV580, 8:05CV246, 8:05CV533, and 8:08CV151 are denied. The court directs the clerk’s office to file this Memorandum and Order in each of the five cases listed in the caption above. DATED this 10 th day of December, 2012. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge Acting in his capacity as Supervising Pro Se Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W eb sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their W eb sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?